Home  
  Contacts  
  About LTF  
  Consultation Responses  
  Publications / Briefings  
  Links  
  E-mail LTF  
     
     
 
 
  Rent Restructuring  
  Housing Benefit Reform  
  Decent Homes  
  Regional Decision Making /Mayors Housing Strategy  
  London Plan  
  Moonlight Robbery  
  Tenant Compacts  
  Leaseholders  
  Tenancy Issues  
  Best Value  
  REITs  
     
     
     
     
 
Research Reports
 
  Regeneration - Elephant and Castle  
  Regeneration - Elephant and Castle (glossary and maps)  
  Future of Housing - Olympic site  
     
     
     
     
London Tenants Federation
 
 
 
   
 

 

London Tenants Federation - BRIEFING - September 2002

RENT-RESTRUCTURING & SERVICE CHARGES


In June 2002 the government produced a consultation paper relating to further changes in HRA Subsidy and rent restructuring. The consultation contains proposals on separating service charges from rent. The government is asking for views from councils and tenants. Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) ordinarily separate out service charges from rents but currently only a few councils do. The government says that separating service charges from rents will increase 'financial transparency' and bring the system in line with RSLs.

What exactly is the government proposing?

  • That councils have discretion to decide what services it is appropriate to charge for.
  • That councils be given progressively stronger financial incentives to introduce service charges. It is proposed that local authorities will be allowed to keep revenue raised from levying service charges. HRA subsidy ordinarily decreases as rents increase - but the government proposes that subsidy will not decrease as service charges increase.
  • That there be limits on increases in existing service charges so that rents plus service charges will not increase more than £2 + RPI plus ½ %.
  • That the maximum rent level (£85 - £100), only apply to rents and not to service charges. (see Briefing 1 for details on rent limits and maximum rent levels)
  • That local authorities avoid levying service charges (or reflecting the true cost) for services like lifts in high rise flats. The cost of servicing large estates and high rise blocks is higher than for street properties. The government proposes that what should and should not be charged for, be left to 'local judgement'.

What are the main issues for tenants?

  • There appears to be nothing of benefit to tenants in these proposals. The introduction of separate service charges has huge implications for London tenants and indeed for the existence of 'affordable' housing here - particularly in the central London.
  • The maximum rent levels set by the government will only apply to rents, not to service charges. Service charges could still be applied above the maximum rent level. The likely outcome is that those unable to afford to pay the rents and service charges will be forced out of expensive property value areas. Our communities will be damaged as a result and certain areas will be exclusively for the wealthy and trendy.
  • Evictions as a result of arrears could increase and more will be forced into dependency on housing benefit.
  • Service charges are about housing management. They reflect the nature of council housing stock and local neighbourhoods. Most local authorities have older and larger estates than those belonging to RSLs. What guarantees are there for those of us living on estates that require high levels of services that will not have to foot the bill, particularly in relation to new services?
  • Any new service added after the separation of service charges from rents will not be subject to limits. Will we only be able to have the new services that we need, if we can afford them?
  • Services that have only recently been introduced on our estates - such as CCTV and neighbourhood wardens will have a huge impact on service charges. Residents living in areas that have huge problems in relation to anti-social behaviour could end up being penalised for those problems by having to pay higher service charges.
  • Currently separate service charges don't effect eligibility for housing benefit. Can this eligibility be guaranteed, when the government intends to make changes to housing benefit and to cut entitlements?
  • The separation of service charges - to bring councils in line with Registered Social Landlords, as with the aligning of the cost of council and RSL rents, seems to be aimed at removing tenant's arguments against privatisation (stock transfer).
  • Although there would be no legal obligation for councils to introduce separate service charges, the government is offering bribes or progressively stronger 'financial incentives', in an attempt to achieve the desired result.


The government's policy for social rents was set out in it's December 2000 policy statement - 'The Way Forward for Housing'. Further details were issued in 'A Guide to Rent Reforms'. Proposals were made in a consultation paper issued last year - 'HRA Subsidy and Rent Restructuring' - 2002-03. The consultation paper relating to service charges was produced in June 2002.