|
The following was printed in Inside Housing 08.10.04
Letters Page
Inside Housing
04.10.04
The consultation around the rent restructuring review has indeed
been deficient (letters - Inside Housing 01.10.04). 2 of the aims
of rent restructuring relate to tenants, i.e. 'to achieve rents
that are fair and that reflect the qualities tenants value in their
homes', yet none were involved in the review. And despite requests
to the ODPM for representation from the London Tenants Federation
(LTF) and other tenant organisations.
There are regional differences in the effects of rent restructuring,
which have not been address by the review. Rents that reflect local
property values simply mean higher social housing rents in London.
As if this alone isn't enough, the ODPM seems happy to propose in
the review, the adoption of property valuations made by housing
associations that are 22% higher than had been expected. The combined
result will mean average rent increases of £40 a month for
London tenants and almost double that amount in some boroughs by
2011/12.
Has the ODPM actually found any London tenants who think this is
'fair or reflects the qualities that we value in our homes'?
It is also difficult to see that the proposals in the review will
help to achieve the other 2 aims of rent restructuring - 'affordability
and harmonisation of council and RSL rents'. In London there will
be no harmonisation - indeed RSL tenants will suffer higher rent
increases than council tenants. When more than 60% of social housing
tenants already have to claim benefit to meet the cost of their
rents, it is difficult to see that hiking rents up further can help
achieve 'affordability'.
Helen Cagnoni
Federation of Islington Tenants Associations LTF member
More on Rent Restructuring
From the press
|